Article not found.
Clanek nenalezen.
Place for your feedback...
22nd October 2006 at 10:54
padlock on FC5 on VIA Luke
If I apply this patch the eng_padlock.o is bigger. Previously is was just about 2K instead of 20+K.
Speedtest gives no improvement.
(but have to install RPM to be sure)

--- crypto/engine/eng_padlock.c.origg 2006-10-22 10:21:40.000000000 +0200
+++ crypto/engine/eng_padlock.c 2006-10-22 10:22:31.000000000 +0200
@@ -99,14 +99,8 @@

In addition, because of the heavy use of inline assembler,
compiler choice is limited to GCC and Microsoft C. */
-#undef COMPILE_HW_PADLOCK
-#if !defined(I386_ONLY) && !defined(OPENSSL_NO_INLINE_ASM)
-# if (defined(__GNUC__) && (defined(__i386__) || defined(__i386))) || \
- (defined(_MSC_VER) && defined(_M_IX86))
# define COMPILE_HW_PADLOCK
static ENGINE *ENGINE_padlock (void);
-# endif
-#endif

void ENGINE_load_padlock (void)
{
Jun 17   16:37 Patch for 2.4.x Kernels ? (by Alex)
Jun 17   16:40 Re: Patch for 2.4.x Kernels ? (by Michal Ludvig)
Feb 22   10:49 Thanks for H2G2 (by Ajay Shenoy)
Oct 19   0:35 Thanks for the mostly harmless book (by Mark Brown)
Dec 31   16:11 studium (by Elis)
Feb 6   22:32 Perl & Secure SMTP (by Andrew)
Feb 6   23:46 Re: Perl & Secure SMTP (by Michal Ludvig)
Jan 19   9:09 Re: Perl & Secure SMTP (by Tirumala)
Jan 19   9:57 Re: Re: Perl & Secure SMTP (by Michal)
Sep 14   3:23 Can't get C3 padlock to work in openssl 0.9.8 (by Cinquero)
Oct 22   10:13 padlock on FC5 on VIA Luke (by udo)
Nov 13   17:33 Re: padlock on FC5 on VIA Luke (by Régis Séguier)
Oct 22   10:54 padlock on FC5 on VIA Luke (by udo)
Oct 22   11:01 padlock on FC5 on VIA Luke (by udo)
Oct 28   16:42 Luke with no-RNG? (by udo)
Oct 28   22:26 Re: Luke with no-RNG? (by Michal)
Feb 13   14:57 logic... (by flex.)
Feb 14   1:04 Re: logic... (by Michal Ludvig)
Feb 27   17:29 Openchrome Driver (by dust)
Nov 26   3:58 "the fuck word" (by niku)
Feb 15   9:00 Dotaz,.. (by Karl von Neklbaur)
Oct 8   6:22 Problems with openssh and via Eden (by Jakob Curdes)